Two recent events should be highlighted to any politician thinking of using twitter to further their electoral prospects. These two stories do serve as maybe a warning, before the commit.
Case 1: Dale v McCarthy.
This case surrounds allegations made by the Hon. Kerry McCarthy, MP for Bristol East, about the political magazine Total Politics, which is run by tory supporting blogger Iain Dale. I shall leave it to each of them to tell their story.
As you can see, politicians have to be careful with what they say and do online! Is one over reacting? Or are both responses justified? You be the jury.
Case 2: Limburg v Schüneman
This case from the Lower Saxon State Parliament. After a debate on Aslyum Seekers, Green MP Helge Limburg called Lower Saxony’s state Interior Minister Uwe Schünemann (CDU) an “insufferable agitator” who was “shamelessly on the right-wing fringe.” (Full Story)
This when it came to light in the Lower Saxon Parliament caused uproar and discussions over the budget had to be postponed.
Is that what twitter should be used for?
So its over to you, after these anticas would you recommend that politicans use twitter?
Related articles by Zemanta
- Why You Should Use Twitter and Tweet for Your Business (suescaletta.com)
- Why political blogging belongs to the insurgent (newstatesman.com)
- Sarah Brown overtakes Stephen Fry on Twitter (telegraph.co.uk)